Grow and let grow!
SHODHAKA Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.



 Supplementary Notes

 SupplementaryNotes_1

 SupplementaryNotes_2

 SupplementaryNotes_3

 SupplementaryNotes_4

 SupplementaryNotes_5

 SupplementaryNotes_6

 SupplementaryNotes_7

 SupplementaryNotes_8

 SupplementaryNotes_9    

 More Details    

E-mail us
shodhaka@ibab.ac.in
  

 
 
Supplementary Notes - 1

Name and URL of bio-literature search engines used in the current study

An important note: As we were preparing the manuscript, several tools kept changing their features and new tools were reported frequently. After some time, we had to stop following up the changes. This shows the flux in the literature search domain. The corresponding author is also developing a new tool to aid very specific aspects of citation retrieval from PubMed!


Literature search engines

URLs

Simple summary scanners

askMEDLINE

http://askMEDLINE.nlm.nih.gov/ask/ask.php

PubMed

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez/

PubMed Assistant

http://metnet.vrac.iastate.edu/browser/

PubMed Interact

https://pmi.nlm.nih.gov/interact/

Full-text scanners

Brij.in

http://www.brij.in

Google Scholar (beta version)

http://scholar.google.com/

HighWire Press

http://highwire.stanford.edu/

PubMed Central

http://www.PubMedcentral.nih.gov/

Scirus

http://www.scirus.com/

Summary scanners that can process the citations for further information

BioAsk (beta version)

http://www.bioask.com/

BioIE

http://www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/dbbrowser/bioie/

CiteXplore

http://www.ebi.ac.uk/citexplore/

ClusterMed

http://demos.vivisimo.com/clustermed

EBIMed

http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Rebholz-srv/ebimed/index.jsp

HubMed

http://www.hubmed.org/

GoPubMed

http://www.goPubMed.org/

Scopus

http://www.scopus.com/scopus/home.url

XplorMed

http://www.ogic.ca/projects/xplormed/


Note: Brief description of each tool can be found at /Litsearch.html

Tools not considered in the current study: We have taken up a large number of search engines for comparative study. However, we were unable to access or use several of these programs due to:
  1. lack of proper user guide,
  2. they were too slow to respond or
  3. required subscription. Except Scopus, which was providing free trial access earlier, we were unable to use the other paid programs (Web of Science, Ovid, NextBio and Scifinder). Similarly, we also could not incorporate some of the relatively new ones (SUMSearch and Novo|seek) in the current analyses. Some tools were non-functional on some of the occasions we tried to access, and hence left out.

copyright © shodhaka life sciences private limited; all rights reserved